首页> 外文OA文献 >Mobile Mapping Systems and Spatial Data Collection Strategies Assessment in the Identification of Horizontal Alignment of Highways
【2h】

Mobile Mapping Systems and Spatial Data Collection Strategies Assessment in the Identification of Horizontal Alignment of Highways

机译:公路水平路线识别中的移动制图系统和空间数据收集策略评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The horizontal alignment of existing highways may be identified by using several terrestrial or aerial geomatics technologies. Such technologies involve different levels of precision and accuracy; hence, different results can be expected. At present, there are no comparisons available between the solutions resulting from the use of different technologies and data sources for the same road alignment. In this investigation, a number of terrestrial mobile mapping techniques and data collection strategies were evaluated. The centerline of a 3.6 km section of a highway was used to estimate radii, centers of curvature and orientation of tangents. Two statistical fitting methods were used to back calculate these parameters, and the results were then compared with as built alignment data. Terrestrial images from a mobile mapping vehicle were used to determine the centerline, which was also estimated as the average line of the carriageway and pavement edges, and as the average line of the two driving trajectories. Positions were surveyed using low-cost sensors (an integrated GPS-IMU platform, HD webcam). For comparison purposes, aerial orthophotos and a GNSS (high-cost) receiver were used simultaneously. Although the GPS IMU data and estimated trajectories provided results comparable to those of the GNSS receiver, the use of georeferenced images proved less accurate. The results and comments in the paper should be of use to survey practitioners when they need to select an acquisition methodology appropriate to the desired level of accuracy and in line with budget constraints.
机译:可以通过使用几种地面或空中地理技术来确定现有高速公路的水平路线。这些技术涉及不同级别的精度和准确性。因此,可以预期会有不同的结果。目前,在针对同一道路路线使用不同技术和数据源的结果之间,没有可比较的解决方案。在这项调查中,评估了许多地面移动制图技术和数据收集策略。一条3.6公里长的公路的中心线用于估算半径,曲率中心和切线方向。使用两种统计拟合方法来反算这些参数,然后将结果与构建的比对数据进行比较。来自移动制图车辆的地面图像被用于确定中心线,该中心线也被估计为行车道和人行道边缘的平均线,以及两个行驶轨迹的平均线。使用低成本传感器(集成的GPS-IMU平台,高清网络摄像头)对位置进行了调查。为了进行比较,同时使用了航空正射影像和GNSS(高价)接收器。尽管GPS IMU数据和估计的轨迹提供了与GNSS接收器可比的结果,但事实证明,使用地理参考图像的准确性较低。本文的结果和评论应供调查从业人员在需要选择适合于所需准确性水平并符合预算限制的采集方法时使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号